<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secrets of Blog Networks and Experts</title>
	<link>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/</link>
	<description>Blogging Tips for Better Bloggers - Web 2.0 - New Media - Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>I wonder how much money they are really making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much money they are really making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Bloke</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-716</guid>
		<description>And I too am happy for you naveen if your experience in a blog network has been good. But I think a writer should have some "real world experience" first before passing themself off as an expert writer on any given topic. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I also have to take you to task about pageranking. That is only one small part of the equation for getting a good search listing. I recommend that you read Googlebot's faq files if you haven't already, and you will see that linking by authority is only a part of the algorithm equation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I too am happy for you naveen if your experience in a blog network has been good. But I think a writer should have some &#8220;real world experience&#8221; first before passing themself off as an expert writer on any given topic. </p>
<p>I also have to take you to task about pageranking. That is only one small part of the equation for getting a good search listing. I recommend that you read Googlebot&#8217;s faq files if you haven&#8217;t already, and you will see that linking by authority is only a part of the algorithm equation.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naveen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Naveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-715</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; It is some of the network's hypocrisy and their writer's general lack of real world experience that I am ranting about.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If by joining a network you get real world experience, don’t you think its real worth of your money and time. And if a network is able to provide you a steady income in addition to it, you can call it a bonus too.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&gt;&gt; I don't know what SE's you use naveen but stuffing certain keywords into blog and page titles really does influence the search engines. In fact it is still common practice and I'm not knocking that either.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I totally agree with you, stuffing keywords in page Title, page URL is a Common practice, and since it’s a common practice it’s no longer an effective practice. Today the most effective way to get high rankings is getting linked by authority sites. Age of domains also play an important part. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&gt;&gt; However, as a former writer for Blogcritics it has also been my unfortunate experience&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I really feel sorry for your “unfortunate experience”. But, I am more than lucky enough to be a part of &lt;a HREF="http://www.instablogs.com" REL="nofollow"&gt;Instablogs Community&lt;/a&gt;. While joining a blog network, you should check a network’s background, people associated with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>> It is some of the network&#8217;s hypocrisy and their writer&#8217;s general lack of real world experience that I am ranting about.</p>
<p>If by joining a network you get real world experience, don’t you think its real worth of your money and time. And if a network is able to provide you a steady income in addition to it, you can call it a bonus too.</p>
<p>>> I don&#8217;t know what SE&#8217;s you use naveen but stuffing certain keywords into blog and page titles really does influence the search engines. In fact it is still common practice and I&#8217;m not knocking that either.</p>
<p>I totally agree with you, stuffing keywords in page Title, page URL is a Common practice, and since it’s a common practice it’s no longer an effective practice. Today the most effective way to get high rankings is getting linked by authority sites. Age of domains also play an important part. </p>
<p>>> However, as a former writer for Blogcritics it has also been my unfortunate experience</p>
<p>I really feel sorry for your “unfortunate experience”. But, I am more than lucky enough to be a part of <a HREF="http://www.instablogs.com" REL="nofollow">Instablogs Community</a>. While joining a blog network, you should check a network’s background, people associated with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Bloke</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-714</guid>
		<description>I once knew of a paralegal organization that allowed anyone into it who had a few dollars burning in their pockets regardless if they had any real world legal experience. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In my view that offers little or no value to anyone except to the network owner who is skimming from the proceeds.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nor am I really discussing the value of content or the use of canned templates. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I was just using a little tongue-in-cheek humor there to make a point (sorry for the warped sense of humor ;-).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It is some of the network's hypocrisy and their writer's general lack of real world experience that I am ranting about.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Don't you think that if you are going to pass yourself off as an expert in a niche market you should at least have some real world experience besides just having a passion for the topic? That is what I am saying.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don't know what SE's you use naveen but stuffing certain keywords into blog and page titles really does influence the search engines. In  fact it is still common practice and I'm not knocking that either.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm just pointing out that it isn't rocket science propelling oneself to the top of the list, but that doesn't necessarily reflect true value of a blog.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I will admit however that is one advantage that the networks do have. The blogger needn't worry so much about SEO techniques to drive traffic and to make money. And isn't making money really the bottom line with networks?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, as a former writer for Blogcritics it has also been my unfortunate experience that at the end of the day it is the network that gains most of the traffic and the value (and the money) -- not the individual writers.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers and thanks for the comment.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;...BB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once knew of a paralegal organization that allowed anyone into it who had a few dollars burning in their pockets regardless if they had any real world legal experience. </p>
<p>In my view that offers little or no value to anyone except to the network owner who is skimming from the proceeds.</p>
<p>Nor am I really discussing the value of content or the use of canned templates. </p>
<p>I was just using a little tongue-in-cheek humor there to make a point (sorry for the warped sense of humor ;-).</p>
<p>It is some of the network&#8217;s hypocrisy and their writer&#8217;s general lack of real world experience that I am ranting about.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you think that if you are going to pass yourself off as an expert in a niche market you should at least have some real world experience besides just having a passion for the topic? That is what I am saying.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what SE&#8217;s you use naveen but stuffing certain keywords into blog and page titles really does influence the search engines. In  fact it is still common practice and I&#8217;m not knocking that either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just pointing out that it isn&#8217;t rocket science propelling oneself to the top of the list, but that doesn&#8217;t necessarily reflect true value of a blog.</p>
<p>I will admit however that is one advantage that the networks do have. The blogger needn&#8217;t worry so much about SEO techniques to drive traffic and to make money. And isn&#8217;t making money really the bottom line with networks?</p>
<p>However, as a former writer for Blogcritics it has also been my unfortunate experience that at the end of the day it is the network that gains most of the traffic and the value (and the money) &#8212; not the individual writers.</p>
<p>Cheers and thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>&#8230;BB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naveen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>naveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Not all Blog networks use default template or common software like wordpress. Few blog networks like Instablogs and Weblogsinc have their own software built. Instablogs, the network I am part of, has custom designs for all 100+ blogs we have in our network. But nevertheless even if the template is same across all networks or common software is used, it doesn’t put any blog network in bad light. Since a blog network is supposed to generate good content, not good designs. Good designs are a bonus.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You second point of being good at SEO, might hold true for an amateur blogger. But today search engines are way too smart to get fooled by stuffed keywords in title. Good ol' days are long gone.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Venture capitalist might be gullible to fall into blog networks trap, but a common reader doesn’t care if any blog is a part of a blog network or not. This is one of the biggest flaws of current blog networks model. Currently they offer no incentive to the readers. But coming to VCs again, most of the blog networks who have been funded recently have shown great growth in past few months, whether its b5media or Popsugar network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all Blog networks use default template or common software like wordpress. Few blog networks like Instablogs and Weblogsinc have their own software built. Instablogs, the network I am part of, has custom designs for all 100+ blogs we have in our network. But nevertheless even if the template is same across all networks or common software is used, it doesn’t put any blog network in bad light. Since a blog network is supposed to generate good content, not good designs. Good designs are a bonus.</p>
<p>You second point of being good at SEO, might hold true for an amateur blogger. But today search engines are way too smart to get fooled by stuffed keywords in title. Good ol&#8217; days are long gone.</p>
<p>Venture capitalist might be gullible to fall into blog networks trap, but a common reader doesn’t care if any blog is a part of a blog network or not. This is one of the biggest flaws of current blog networks model. Currently they offer no incentive to the readers. But coming to VCs again, most of the blog networks who have been funded recently have shown great growth in past few months, whether its b5media or Popsugar network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamarra</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>tamarra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-712</guid>
		<description>you've got brass kahunas bloke, and you are usually right too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;ve got brass kahunas bloke, and you are usually right too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogbloke.com/secrets-of-blog-networks-and-experts/#comment-711</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bloke for saying what needed to be said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bloke for saying what needed to be said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
