<   Prior Home         Share Blog Bloke     Share Blog Bloke Tips       Share to Twitter       Share to Facebook       Share to Twitter       Share to Google Plus       Share to LinkedIn       Pin this       Get Updates            
        Next   >  

Google’s Pay For Links Flip Flop

You may have heard by now about Google penalizing itself after getting caught paying bloggers for links to promote it’s Chrome browser. Apparently Google is ignorant of it’s own links policy, and after being called out for hypocrisy for breaking its own rules it is demoting (not banning) itself in the search engine results for two months.

‘We’ve investigated and are taking manual action to demote Chrome and lower the site’s PageRank for a period of at least 60 days,’ a spokesman said in an email. Source

What concerns me about this story is how Google could possibly be ignorant of it’s own rules that it’s search engine algorithms are based on, and the reason that its Panda Update was designed to remedy?

Google has already removed most of the offending posts - which it claimed were created by a third-party advertising agency. The posts violate Google’s own policies on which links and posts are counted in search results. Google traditionally frowns on any posts that are created with a view to boosting a site’s PageRank by linking to it.

Personally I think it’s shameful, and given all of the hiccups from Google lately it only adds another black eye to Larry Page’s term as CEO.

And what does it say about all of the bloggers who accepted money from Google to publish the links. Shouldn’t they know better? Neither were the links nofollowed. It’s absolutely shameful.

Some SEOs and webmasters engage in the practice of buying and selling links that pass PageRank, disregarding the quality of the links, the sources, and the long-term impact it will have on their sites,’ the site says in its policies. Buying or selling links that pass PageRank is in violation of Google’s Webmaster Guidelines and can negatively impact a site’s ranking in search results. The posts contained very vague praise of Chrome with little original content, and helped the browser gain in popularity in Google’s PageRank algorithm which determines which sites come at the top of search results.

So how could Google have not known about the campaign until it was caught red-handed? Instead Google cried foul and said that it did not authorise the controversial marketing campaign, claiming that it consistently avoids paid sponsorships.

To me that’s like Bart Simpson being caught with his hand in the cookie jar and claiming “I didn’t do it”.

By implication this infers its advertising firm Unruly was responsible. But that flies in the face of common sense and clearly someone at Google must liason with it’s partners and should have known about the campaign. To say anything otherwise is an insult to our collective intelligence.

So that being the case then who authorized it? Clearly someone at Google is responsible so why aren’t we hearing names? And if a Google employee made the decision to go ahead with the campaign (which is likely) then Google is responsible .. plain and simple.

When you are in a position of setting the rules you should be above reproach. Google isn’t omnipotent after all.

Written January 5th, 2012 by | 6 Comments | Filed under: Blog Ethics, Blog Tips, Search Engine Tips

Thanks for Sharing     Share - enable java in your browser Share to Twitter            

Did you enjoy this article? Keep up to date with Blog Bloke Tips the moment it's published by email. Your Privacy is Guaranteed and will not be shared with anyone.

Keep it real with Blog Bloke Thanks for reading the original Blog Bloke. You can read more about me here. Contact me if you have any questions, tip requests or if you would like to be a guest blogger. Keep it real every day and subscribe to the newsfeed, share with friends or follow me.

    Subscribe to the Newsfeed     Share to Twitter     Share to Facebook     Share to Google Plus     Pin this     Share to LinkedIn

Got an opinion? Let's be real and start a conversation:

It's your turn to tell Blog Bloke what you think, ask a question or suggest another blog tip. Don't forget the comments policy and I'm looking forward to reading what you have to say.

There are 6 Comments so far to “Google’s Pay For Links Flip Flop”

  1. Google’s Pay For Links Scam http://t.co/8dwN4Wdk via @BLOGBloke

  2. Google’s Pay For Links Flip Flop http://t.co/81qXgpwU via @BLOGBloke

  3. Google’s Pay For Links Flip Flop http://t.co/81qXgpwU via @BLOGBloke

  4. via @blogbloke Google’s Pay For Links Flip Flop: You may have heard by now about Google penalizing its… http://t.co/JHxZuvq1 #blogging

  5. Google’s Pay For Links Flip Flop http://t.co/r3KABts5 via @BLOGBloke

  6. Google’s Pay For Links Flip Flop http://t.co/r3KABts5 via @BLOGBloke

Share     Share this article with your friends

Subscribe to Better Blog Tips Newsfeed   SUBSCRIBE to Bloke Bloke's Articles (Newsfeed)

Subscribe to Better Blog Tips Newsfeed   Subscribe to only Comments for this Article | TrackBack URL

You can also use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>